This is a guest post from Sagar Jani, Digital Strategist at Station X Communications.
Google's recent algorithm updates, which fully integrate and prioritize Google + into its search results, have spurred a wave of debate and criticism, and it’s quite clear that the search engine giant is losing out in the arena of public opinion. No stranger to controversy, however, Google has made other questionable moves in the past, including Google Wave or the Buzz for example. They have also been involved in suspect deals, including one where they profited from online Canadian pharmacies running illegal ads, a deal which proved to be a $500 million mistake.
Despite this, Google’s core business, the search engine responsible for the majority of its revenue and traffic, has remained largely secure. However, Bing has been plugging away over time, becoming the number 2 search engine, and this recent move has inadvertently helped Bing gain popularity.
The reception to this change has been all but warm: Gizmodo has labeled Bing as the better of the 2 search engines, and Dave Winer at Scripting News stated that "Google's search is getting cluttered with pointless crap", concluding that he’ll stay with Bing as long as it continues to outperform Google.
Google has indicated that this change will deliver more personalized results, but some have seen these results skewed more towards Google services than anything else (Google+, Picasa, YouTube, for instance). Take the following scenario: when you search for a restaurant, you're now presented with Google Plus results before Yelp results, where there are generally a large number of useful restaurant reviews. As you can imagine, this doesn't strike a positive chord with many users. Adding to this discontent, SearchEngineland has compiled several damaging examples of the ways in which Google's new interface promotes Plus over relevancy.
Of course, Google has an incredibly strong global brand presence, with millions of loyal followers, and it remains to be seen what kind of effect these changes will have on the mass of searchers. With two more influential Web sites moving over to Bing's side this week, others may follow. Microsoft might be pulling its "build a competitor, then wait for the rivals to crumble" strategy as it did with Netscape, AOL, and Sony. We will keep a close eye on the ComScore search reports over next few months, when we can fully assess the impact of Google’s recent move. In the meantime, Microsoft adCenter may see an upswing in popularity, as it already displays ads to 30% of the market.

A new Chrome extension was released by Google on Monday and it aims to help the search engine detect content farms by having users give “explicit feedback” on shallow, low-quality content. Essentially the extension allows users to block websites with poor content from their search results. Once a user blocks a site, a notification is sent to Google allowing them to, “study the resulting feedback and explore using it as a potential ranking signal for search results.” The extension also allows users to manage blocked sites, and unblock them at any time.
It’s not often that a major news publication takes an interest in one organization’s SEO tactics, but that’s exactly what happened when The New York Times did a little investigative research into J.C. Penney’s link building strategy and the findings (published this past weekend) showed that the company was implementing some frowned-upon black hat SEO practices to help boost their rankings in Google search results.
We just finished today's SEO webinar on link building and as usual afterwards we give a quick recap of the main highlights of the webinar here. If you'd like to view our How to Find Link Love webinar you can see it and our other web marketing webinars on-demand in our resource section.
What is SEO?
According to Wikipedia, HTML5 is the, “next major revision of the HTML standard. Like its immediate predecessors, HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.1, HTML5 is a standard for structuring and presenting content on the World Wide Web.”
Today's recap post from our webinar, "SEO Basics - Closing the Loop from Design to Build to Marketing" will cover the questions we didn't have time to answer during the course of the presentation.
When you’re writing your website copy with your SEO strategy at the forefront of your mind, it’s important to take a step back and make sure that you’re still writing with your customers’ needs and wants at heart. When it comes to writing SEO-friendly website copy, you need to make sure you know the difference between well-written optimized copy, and keyword-stuffed garbage. Sometimes it’s important to remember that while you want your website to do well in search engines you should ultimately be writing your copy for your customers, not (search engine) spiders.
Here at Marqui, we get tons of requests from people who need or want help with their Search Engine Optimization. Some people have a pretty good idea of what they should be doing and just want a little bit of advice on how they can make the appropriate change. On the other hand, we also get a few people who come to us for help who either have very little idea of what they should be doing, or, are doing things actively wrong.
As a follow up to yesterday’s post on what long tail keywords are and why they’re important, today’s post will give you some of our tips on how you can choose your long tail keywords and how you can leverage them to help your overall web marketing strategy.

Proper search engine optimization (SEO) is a key aspect of every web marketing strategy (or it should be) but many times optimizing a website is seen as an afterthought to design when a company is trying to revamp its website. When it comes to designing a website that will be optimized from the get-go, it is essential that your company’s marketing team be involved from conceptualization straight through to launch. Why is this? Well that’s where we come to of part 1 our biggest website redesign mistake with regards to SEO.
Part 1: Leaving your website’s SEO until the website is already designed.
For some reason, a lot of people seem to believe that SEO is a process that should begin once a website is already up and running, when this is in fact that opposite of what should really be taking place. Would you go on a trip before you pack? Would you wait until you were sunburnt before applying sunscreen? Well, maybe you would, but I think we can both agree it would be a poor decision. The same goes for trying to implement SEO once your website has alrady been designed and built.
When your SEO is done properly, it helps you to determine the type of content that should be present on your site to help it rank well in search engines from the time it launches onwards, and, realistically, you shouldn’t be designing a website if you don’t know what content will be on it, right? Now, we’re not saying that you should design your website specifically around the keywords you’ve determined it will be easier to rank for during keyword research. What we’re saying is that determining how your customers find you and what they are looking for on websites in your industry is an important step in determining what content will be present on your website, and, depending on what kind of content your site needs to appeal to your target audience, your design will probably change to reflect that. This might sound like a relatively straight forward idea, you might even think this is a no-brainer, but you have no idea how many times we’ve seen companies come to us looking for some SEO consulting help, only for us to realize that they’ve built their entire website without once taking SEO into consideration. They have essentially built their website on a weak foundation. In addition, there is always the danger that if your website designer has no experience with SEO, then they won’t have designed or built your site in such a way that you can implement optimization tactics successfully without paying them for further development.
Part 2: Having your design firm do your SEO for you.
What is Google Caffeine? 
So what was BP's reasoning behind this? According to a spokesperson for the company, they purchased these terms in order to “make the information on the spill more accessible to the public.”
Since implementing this strategy BP has come under some harsh criticism for their tactics, and many critics feel that their choice was unethical. Many search engine marketers are questioning whether trying to control what the public finds when they search for information on the oil spill is just a reputation damage control tactic, rather than a way to inform the public about the oil spill itself, especially since many non-technical web users may not realize the difference between paid listings and actual organic news results.
As of this morning, the ads seem to have been taken down (see below). Does this mean that BP has decided they no longer want to “make the information on the spill more accessible” or are they merely crumbling under the pressure they are receiving for their questionable methods?

No matter what their reasons for buying the ads in the first place (or taking them down) it seems pretty obvious that their latest venture has done little or nothing to improve the public’s opinion of their brand.
Personally, we think that BP should start taking the advice of their fake BP PR Twitter account which has already garnered over 100,000 followers.
If you'd like to read some articles on this subject we suggest you look at the resources below:
Fox News - BP Manipulating Search Results on Google, Critics Accuse
ABC News - BP Buys 'Oil' Search Terms to Redirect Users to Official Company Website



We just finished this week's web marketing webinar on SEO and we received some great feedback and quite a few questions. We were unable to get to all the questions during the course of the webinar so for those of you who didn't get your question answered, we've chosen the most frequently asked to answer below:
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is one of the best opportunities that companies have to generate high quality leads for their sales teams. Unfortunately, many organizations are committing one (or many) of these common mistakes without even realizing it.
We got some great feedback from our last search engine optimization (SEO) webinar, "Live Website Assessment" so we decided to present another webinar on SEO basics and bring Jeff Hall, one of our marketing consultants back to present again.